Benchmarkmärchen mit Fortsetzung...

[Bokill]

Netter Benchmarkvergleich von Grakas:

ATI Fire GL1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2000

NVIDIA FX 5900 Ultra

Also nur für echte Profis, welche wirklich damit Geld verdienen!

Test- Konfiguration

Hardware
Pentium 4 3.06GHz CPU;
ASUS P4PE mainboard;
1GB DDR SDRAM, CL2;
Graphics cards: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 and 2000, ATI FireGL X1 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra;
30GB Barracuda ATA V HDD.

Software
Windows XP SP1;
3ds max 5 (OpenGL rendering), 1280x1024, 32bit;
Texture size (if not specified): 512x512 background, 256x256 material;
Treiber für NVIDIA Karten: Detonator 44.03 (V-Sync off) + Maxtreme 4.00.29
Treiber für FireGL X1: version 1021

The comparative background is formed by Quadro FX 2000 (based on GeForce 5800 Ultra), FireGL X1 (based on RADEON 9700 PRO) and a GeForce FX 5900 Ultra based gaming card (to show how greatly optimized drivers may affect the performance of a GPU).

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...drofx3000.html

Da kann man sehen was noch in den Treibern alles schlummert!

Conclusion
As you have seen in the benchmarks, Quadro FX 3000 wins most of the tests. This card has much higher memory bandwidth (1700MHz against 1000MHz) than Quadro 2000, and nearly the same core frequency (450MHz against 466MHz). Still, NVIDIA had to sell out its Quadro 2000 cards (as you remember, NV30-based cards mostly went to the professional market) and that’s why the professional NV35-based product came out later than the gaming analog. However, this is not the end of the battle. ATI is preparing its FireGL X2 graphics card based on the RADEON 9800 PRO GPU. And this card will surely have a higher performance boost over the current flagship, RADEON 9700 PRO-based X1, than in the case of NV30/NV35.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...ofx3000_6.html