AMD Reports 2014 Second Quarter Results

- Trans­for­ma­ti­on stra­tegy on track -

 Q2 2014 Results

  • Reve­nue of $1.44 bil­li­on, increased 3 per­cent sequen­ti­al­ly and 24 per­cent year-over-year
  • Gross mar­gin of 35 percent
  • Ope­ra­ting inco­me of $63 mil­li­on and non-GAAP(1) ope­ra­ting inco­me of $67 million
  • Net loss of $36 mil­li­on, loss per share of $0.05 and non-GAAP(1) net inco­me of $17 mil­li­on, ear­nings per share of $0.02

SUNNYVALE, Calif. – July 17, 2014 –AMD (NYSE:AMD) today announ­ced reve­nue for the second quar­ter of 2014 of $1.44 bil­li­on, ope­ra­ting inco­me of $63 mil­li­on and net loss of $36 mil­li­on, or $0.05 per share. Non-GAAP ope­ra­ting inco­me was $67 mil­li­on and non-GAAP net inco­me, which pri­ma­ri­ly excludes $49 mil­li­on of loss from debt redemp­ti­on in the quar­ter, was $17 mil­li­on, or $0.02 per share.

The second quar­ter cap­ped off a solid first half of the year for AMD with strong reve­nue growth and impro­ved finan­cial per­for­mance,” said Rory Read, AMD pre­si­dent and CEO. “Our trans­for­ma­ti­on stra­tegy is on track and we expect to deli­ver full year non-GAAP pro­fi­ta­bi­li­ty and year-over-year reve­nue growth.  We con­ti­nue to streng­then our busi­ness model and shape AMD into a more agi­le com­pa­ny offe­ring dif­fe­ren­tia­ted solu­ti­ons for a diver­se set of markets.”

GAAP Finan­cial Results

 

Q2-14 Q1-14 Q2-13
Reve­nue $1.44B $1.40B $1.16B
Ope­ra­ting inco­me (loss) $63M $49M $(29)M
Net loss / Loss per share $(36)M/$(0.05) $(20)M/$(0.03) $(74)M/$(0.10)

 

Non-GAAP Finan­cial Results (1)

 

Q2-14 Q1-14 Q2-13
Reve­nue $1.44B $1.40B $1.16B
Ope­ra­ting inco­me (loss) $67M $66M $(20)M
Net inco­me (loss) / Ear­nings (loss) per share $17M/$0.02 $12M/$0.02 $(65)M/$(0.09)

 

Quar­ter­ly Finan­cial Summary

  • Gross mar­gin was 35 per­cent in Q2 2014.

o   Gross mar­gin was flat sequentially.

  • Cash, cash equi­va­lents and mar­ke­ta­ble secu­ri­ties were $948 mil­li­on at the end of the quar­ter, signi­fi­cant­ly hig­her than the tar­get mini­mum of $600 mil­li­on and clo­se to the opti­mal zone of $1 billion.
  • Total debtat the end of the quar­ter was $2.21 bil­li­on, an increase from $2.14 bil­li­on at the end of Q1 2014.

o   During Q2 2014, the com­pa­ny con­tin­ued re-pro­fil­ing its near-term debt matu­ri­ties, issuing $500 mil­li­on in aggre­ga­te prin­ci­pal amount of 7.00% Seni­or Notes due 2024 and repurcha­sing all $452 mil­li­on aggre­ga­te prin­ci­pal amount of the company’s out­stan­ding 8.125% Seni­or Notes due 2017.

  • Com­pu­ting Solu­ti­ons seg­ment reve­nue increased 1 per­cent sequen­ti­al­ly and decreased 20 per­cent year-over-year. The year-over-year decli­ne was due to decreased micro­pro­ces­sor unit shipments.

o   Ope­ra­ting inco­me was $9 mil­li­on, an impro­ve­ment from an ope­ra­ting loss of $3 mil­li­on in Q1 2014 and ope­ra­ting inco­me of $2 mil­li­on in Q2 2013. The sequen­ti­al increase was pri­ma­ri­ly dri­ven by impro­ved gross mar­gin due to a richer mix of note­book pro­ducts while the year-over-year increase was pri­ma­ri­ly dri­ven by lower ope­ra­ting expenses.

o   Micro­pro­ces­sor avera­ge sel­ling pri­ce (ASP) increased sequen­ti­al­ly and year-over-year.

  • Gra­phics and Visu­al Solu­ti­ons seg­ment reve­nue increased 5 per­cent sequen­ti­al­ly and 141 per­cent year-over-year dri­ven lar­ge­ly by increased semi-cus­tom SoC ship­ments. Gra­phics pro­ces­sor unit (GPU) reve­nue decreased sequen­ti­al­ly and year-over-year, pri­ma­ri­ly due to a decrease in AIB chan­nel sales, par­ti­al­ly off­set by increased sales of pro­fes­sio­nal gra­phics and desk­top OEM GPUs.

o   Ope­ra­ting inco­me was $82 mil­li­on com­pared with $91 mil­li­on in Q1 2014 and brea­k­e­ven in Q2 2013. The sequen­ti­al decli­ne was pri­ma­ri­ly­due to lower GPU reve­nue, while the year-over-year increase was dri­ven byin­creased sales of semi-cus­tom SoCs.

o   GPU ASP decreased sequen­ti­al­ly and year-over-year, pri­ma­ri­ly dri­ven by  lower AIB chan­nel sales.

 

Recent High­lights

  • AMD unvei­ledfur­ther details on its ambi­dex­trous com­pu­ting road­map, inclu­ding a 64-bit ARM archi­tec­tu­re licen­se and plans to deve­lop cus­tom high-per­for­mance ARM and x86 pro­ces­sor cores for 2016. The company’s dif­fe­ren­tia­ted x86 and ARM stra­tegy is desi­gned to deli­ver unmat­ched com­pu­ting and gra­phics per­for­mance using a shared, fle­xi­ble infra­struc­tu­re to dri­ve new innovations.
  • AMD appoin­ted Dr. Lisa Su to Chief Ope­ra­ting Offi­cer, respon­si­ble for over­see­ing the company’s pre­vious­ly sepa­ra­te glo­bal ope­ra­ti­ons, ope­ra­ting seg­ments and sales orga­niza­ti­on to dri­ve growth in both tra­di­tio­nal PC and adja­cent markets.
  • AMD rea­li­gned its orga­niza­ti­on struc­tu­re to deli­ver unmat­ched cus­to­mer value in both tra­di­tio­nal PC mar­kets and adja­cent high-growth mar­kets. Effec­ti­ve July 1, 2014, AMD’s two new repor­ta­ble seg­ments are as follows:

o   Com­pu­ting and Gra­phics seg­ment, which will pri­ma­ri­ly include desk­top and note­book pro­ces­sors and chip­sets, dis­crete GPUs and pro­fes­sio­nal graphics;

o   Enter­pri­se, Embedded and Semi-Cus­tom seg­ment, which will pri­ma­ri­ly include ser­ver and embedded pro­ces­sors, den­se ser­vers, semi-cus­tom SoC pro­ducts, deve­lo­p­ment ser­vices and tech­no­lo­gy for game consoles.

o   AMD’s Quar­ter­ly Report on Form 10‑Q for the quar­ter ended Sep­tem­ber 27, 2014 will reflect this new seg­ment report­ing structure.

  • AMD detail­ed its plans to acce­le­ra­te the ener­gy effi­ci­en­cy of its acce­le­ra­ted pro­ces­sing units (APUs) deli­ve­ring 25x effi­ci­en­cy impro­ve­ments by 2020 through design opti­miza­ti­ons, intel­li­gent power manage­ment and Hete­ro­ge­neous Sys­tem Archi­tec­tu­re advan­ces that are expec­ted to enable AMD to out­pace the industry’s his­to­ri­cal ener­gy effi­ci­en­cy trend by at least 70 percent.
  • AMD con­tin­ued to gain momen­tum with its embedded pro­ducts in the second quarter.

o   The com­pa­ny intro­du­ced the 2nd-gene­ra­ti­on embedded R‑Series APUas well as the AMD embedded G‑Series SoC and CPU solu­ti­ons, which will power HP thin cli­ents  and Advantech’s new embedded indus­tri­al solu­ti­on and are ide­al­ly sui­ted for ATMs, kiosks and medi­cal equip­ment applications.

o   AMD embedded Rade­on™ gra­phics were sel­ec­ted by Boe­ingfor its next-gene­ra­ti­on advan­ced cock­pit dis­play systems.

  • AMD publicly demons­tra­ted for the first time its 64-bit ARM-based AMD Opte­ron™ A‑Seriespro­ces­sor, code­na­med “Seat­tle,” a signi­fi­cant step for­ward in expan­ding the foot­print of ultra-effi­ci­ent 64-bit ARM solu­ti­ons for cloud com­pu­ting and the Inter­net of Things.
  • AMD expan­ded its mobi­le APU offe­rings in the quarter:

o   Acer, Dell, HP and Leno­vo have all intro­du­ced note­books powered by AMD’s newest 3rd-gene­ra­ti­on main­stream mobi­le APUs, which com­bi­ne cate­go­ry-lea­ding com­pu­te per­for­mance2,3 with uni­que fea­tures and rich user interactions.

o   AMD also laun­ched its most advan­ced mobi­le APUs for con­su­mer and com­mer­cial note­books. The new 2014 per­for­mance mobi­le APUs include AMD’s first FX-bran­ded enthu­si­ast class APU for note­books as well as AMD Pro A‑Series APUs. HP is offe­ring the AMD PRO A‑Series APUs across its Eli­te 700-Series note­books, desk­tops and all-in-ones, with addi­tio­nal OEMs expec­ted to intro­du­ce sys­tems later this year.

  • AMD expan­ded its 2nd-gene­ra­ti­on Gra­phics Core Next-based pro­fes­sio­nal gra­phics solu­ti­ons with the intro­duc­tion of the AMD Fire­Pro W8100 pro­fes­sio­nal gra­phics card, which deli­vers 38x more per­for­mance4 than the clo­sest com­pe­ti­ti­ve offe­rings based on dou­ble pre­cis­i­on test­ing. Dell, HP and more than 10 work­sta­tion sys­tem inte­gra­tors have all announ­ced sys­tems fea­turing the new card.
  • AMD’s ground­brea­king Man­t­le API, which crea­tes more immersi­ve expe­ri­en­ces that take ful­ler advan­ta­ge of modern APUs and GPUs to deli­ver con­so­le-like expe­ri­en­ces, will be used byElec­tro­nic Arts in the upco­ming  Batt­le­field Hard­li­ne™Dra­gon Age: Inqui­si­ti­on™ and Plants vs. Zom­bies: Gar­den War­fa­re™ games. More than 40 game titles sup­port­ing Man­t­le are in deve­lo­p­ment with more than 50 deve­lo­pers actively working with the API for future titles.

Cur­rent Outlook

AMD’s out­look state­ments are based on cur­rent expec­ta­ti­ons. The fol­lo­wing state­ments are for­ward-loo­king, and actu­al results could dif­fer mate­ri­al­ly depen­ding on mar­ket con­di­ti­ons and the fac­tors set forth under “Cau­tio­na­ry State­ment” below.

For the third quar­ter of 2014, AMD expects reve­nue to increase 2 per­cent, plus or minus 3 per­cent, sequentially.

For addi­tio­nal details regar­ding AMD’s results and out­look plea­se see the CFO com­men­ta­ry pos­ted at quarterlyearnings.amd.com.

AMD Tele­con­fe­rence

AMD will hold a con­fe­rence call for the finan­cial com­mu­ni­ty at 2:30 p.m. PT (5:30 p.m. ET) today to dis­cuss its second quar­ter finan­cial results. AMD will pro­vi­de a real-time audio broad­cast of the tele­con­fe­rence on the Inves­tor Rela­ti­ons page of its web site at www.amd.com. The web­cast will be available for 12 months after the con­fe­rence call.

Recon­ci­lia­ti­on of GAAP to Non-GAAP Ope­ra­ting Inco­me (Loss) 1

Recon­ci­lia­ti­on of GAAP Net Loss to Non-GAAP Net Inco­me (Loss)

About AMD

AMD (NYSE: AMD) designs and inte­gra­tes tech­no­lo­gy that powers mil­li­ons of intel­li­gent devices, inclu­ding per­so­nal com­pu­ters, tablets, game con­so­les and cloud ser­vers that defi­ne the new era of sur­round com­pu­ting. AMD solu­ti­ons enable peo­p­le ever­y­whe­re to rea­li­ze the full poten­ti­al of their favo­ri­te devices and appli­ca­ti­ons to push the boun­da­ries of what is pos­si­ble. For more infor­ma­ti­on, visit www.amd.com.

Cau­tio­na­ry Statement

This ear­nings press release con­ta­ins for­ward-loo­king state­ments con­cer­ning AMD, its abili­ty to deli­ver non-GAAP pro­fi­ta­bi­li­ty and reve­nue growth; its abili­ty to diver­si­fy its busi­ness; its tar­ge­ted and opti­mal cash, cash equi­va­lents and mar­ke­ta­ble secu­ri­ties balan­ces; expec­ted OEM intro­duc­tions of its pro­ducts and its expec­ted third quar­ter of 2014 reve­nue; which are made pur­su­ant to the safe har­bor pro­vi­si­ons of the Pri­va­te Secu­ri­ties Liti­ga­ti­on Reform Act of 1995. For­ward-loo­king state­ments are com­mon­ly iden­ti­fied by words such as “belie­ves, “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “intends,” “pro for­ma,” “esti­ma­tes,” “anti­ci­pa­tes,” “plans,” “pro­jects,” “would” and other terms with simi­lar mea­ning. Inves­tors are cau­tio­ned that the for­ward-loo­king state­ments in this release are based on cur­rent beliefs, assump­ti­ons and expec­ta­ti­ons, speak only as of the date of this release and invol­ve risks and uncer­tain­ties that could cau­se actu­al results to dif­fer mate­ri­al­ly from cur­rent expec­ta­ti­ons. Risks include the pos­si­bi­li­ty that Intel Corporation’s pri­cing, mar­ke­ting and reba­ting pro­grams, pro­duct bund­ling, stan­dard set­ting, new pro­duct intro­duc­tions or other acti­vi­ties may nega­tively impact AMD’s plans; that AMD will requi­re addi­tio­nal fun­ding and may be unable to rai­se suf­fi­ci­ent capi­tal on favorable terms, or at all; that cus­to­mers stop buy­ing AMD’s pro­ducts or mate­ri­al­ly redu­ce their ope­ra­ti­ons or demand for AMD’s pro­ducts; that AMD may be unable to deve­lop, launch and ramp new pro­ducts and tech­no­lo­gies in the volu­mes that are requi­red by the mar­ket at matu­re yields on a time­ly basis; that AMD’s third-par­ty foundry sup­pli­ers will be unable to tran­si­ti­on AMD’s pro­ducts to advan­ced manu­fac­tu­ring pro­cess tech­no­lo­gies in a time­ly and effec­ti­ve way or to manu­fac­tu­re AMD’s pro­ducts on a time­ly basis in suf­fi­ci­ent quan­ti­ties and using com­pe­ti­ti­ve pro­cess tech­no­lo­gies; that AMD will be unable to obtain suf­fi­ci­ent manu­fac­tu­ring capa­ci­ty or com­pon­ents to meet demand for its pro­ducts or will not ful­ly uti­li­ze its pro­jec­ted manu­fac­tu­ring capa­ci­ty needs at GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. (GF) micro­pro­ces­sor manu­fac­tu­ring faci­li­ties; that AMD’s requi­re­ments for wafers will be less than the fixed num­ber of wafers that it agreed to purcha­se from GF or GF encoun­ters pro­blems that signi­fi­cant­ly redu­ce the num­ber of func­tion­al die it recei­ves from each wafer; that AMD is unable to suc­cessful­ly imple­ment its long-term busi­ness stra­tegy; that AMD inac­cu­ra­te­ly esti­ma­tes the quan­ti­ty or type of pro­ducts that its cus­to­mers will want in the future or will ulti­m­ate­ly end up purcha­sing, resul­ting in excess or obso­le­te inven­to­ry; that AMD is unable to mana­ge the risks rela­ted to the use of its third-par­ty dis­tri­bu­tors and add-in-board (AIB) part­ners or offer the appro­pria­te incen­ti­ves to focus them on the sale of AMD’s pro­ducts; that AMD may be unable to main­tain the level of invest­ment in rese­arch and deve­lo­p­ment that is requi­red to remain com­pe­ti­ti­ve; that the­re may be unex­pec­ted varia­ti­ons in mar­ket growth and demand for AMD’s pro­ducts and tech­no­lo­gies in light of the pro­duct mix that it may have available at any par­ti­cu­lar time; that glo­bal busi­ness and eco­no­mic con­di­ti­ons will not impro­ve or will wor­sen; that PC mar­ket con­di­ti­ons, will not impro­ve or will wor­sen; that demand for com­pu­ters will be lower than curr­ent­ly expec­ted; and the effect of poli­ti­cal or eco­no­mic insta­bi­li­ty, dome­sti­cal­ly or inter­na­tio­nal­ly, on AMD’s sales or sup­p­ly chain. Inves­tors are urged to review in detail the risks and uncer­tain­ties in AMD’s Secu­ri­ties and Exch­an­ge Com­mis­si­on filings, inclu­ding but not limi­t­ed to the Quar­ter­ly Report on Form 10‑Q for the quar­ter ended March 29, 2014.

 

-30-

 

AMD, the AMD Arrow logo, AMD Opte­ron, AMD Rade­on and com­bi­na­ti­ons the­reof, are trade­marks of Advan­ced Micro Devices, Inc. Other names are for infor­ma­tio­nal pur­po­ses only and used to iden­ti­fy com­pa­nies and pro­ducts and may be trade­marks of their respec­ti­ve owner.

 

  1. In this ear­nings press release, in addi­ti­on to GAAP finan­cial results, AMD has pro­vi­ded non-GAAP finan­cial mea­su­res inclu­ding non-GAAP ope­ra­ting inco­me (loss), non-GAAP net inco­me (loss) and non-GAAP ear­nings (loss) per share. The­se non-GAAP finan­cial mea­su­res reflect cer­tain adjus­t­ments as pre­sen­ted in the tables in this ear­nings press release. AMD also pro­vi­ded Adjus­ted EBITDA and non-GAAP free cash flow as sup­ple­men­tal mea­su­res of its per­for­mance. The­se items are defi­ned in the foot­no­tes to the sel­ec­ted cor­po­ra­te data tables pro­vi­ded at the end of this ear­nings press release. AMD is pro­vi­ding the­se finan­cial mea­su­res becau­se it belie­ves this non-GAAP pre­sen­ta­ti­on makes it easier for inves­tors to compa­re its ope­ra­ting results for cur­rent and his­to­ri­cal peri­ods and also becau­se AMD belie­ves it assists inves­tors in com­pa­ring AMD’s per­for­mance across report­ing peri­ods on a con­sis­tent basis by exclu­ding items that it does not belie­ve are indi­ca­ti­ve of its core ope­ra­ting per­for­mance and for the other reasons descri­bed in the foot­no­tes to the sel­ec­ted data tables. Refer to the data tables at the end of this ear­nings press release for addi­tio­nal AMD data.
  2. Test­ing con­duc­ted by AMD Per­for­mance Labs on opti­mi­zed AMD refe­rence sys­tems. PC manu­fac­tu­r­ers may vary con­fi­gu­ra­ti­on yiel­ding dif­fe­rent results. Base­mark CL is used to simu­la­te com­pu­te per­for­mance; AMD A6-6310 APU scored 21 while the “Has­well U” Pen­ti­um part scored 3. AMD “Lar­ne” refe­rence plat­form sys­tem using AMD A6-6310 APU with AMD Rade­on™ R4 Gra­phics, 2x2048 MBytes of DDR3-1600 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, and 13.300.0.0 — 13-Jan-2014 dri­ver. Intel® Pen­ti­um® 3556U @ 1.70GHz with Intel® HD Gra­phics, 2x2048 MBytes of DDR3-1600 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 10.18.10.3412 — 28-Jan-2014 dri­ver. BMN-11
  3. Test­ing con­duc­ted by AMD Per­for­mance Labs on opti­mi­zed AMD refe­rence sys­tems. PC manu­fac­tu­r­ers may vary con­fi­gu­ra­ti­on yiel­ding dif­fe­rent results. Base­mark CL is used to simu­la­te com­pu­te per­for­mance; A4 Micro-6400T APU scored 13 while the “Bay Trail T” plat­form scored 4. AMD “Dis­co­very” refe­rence plat­form sys­tem using AMD A4 Micro-6400T APU with Rade­on™ R6 Gra­phics, 2048 MBytes of DDR3-

 

1333 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 13.302.1101.0 — 12-Feb-2014 dri­ver. Intel® “Bay Trail T” Atom™ CPU Z3770 @ 1.46GHz with Intel® HD Gra­phics, 2x1024 MBytes of DDR3-1066 RAM, 1920x1200x32, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 10.18.10.3348 — 30-Oct-2013 dri­ver. MUN-20

SiS­oft­ware San­dra test details: Sys­tem Descrip­ti­on: AMD Fire­Pro W8100 vs. Nvi­dia Qua­dro K5000 — Dell T3610, Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.60 GHz, 8GB DDR3, Sea­gate HDD 7200RPM, Win7 64-bit SP1, 1920x1080 reso­lu­ti­on. AMD Dri­ver 13.352.1009 | Nvi­dia D