Next-Generation Mobile APUs Extend AMD Performance Leadership, Add Cutting-Edge Features and Enhanced Security

— 2014 Main­stream and Low-Power pro­ces­sors deli­ver first-of-its-kind secu­ri­ty solu­ti­on and dou­ble-digit increa­ses in performance-per-watt —

SUNNYVALE, Calif. — April 29, 2014 — Desi­gned to enable the best user expe­ri­ence on today’s most popu­lar and inno­va­ti­ve PCs, AMD (NYSE: AMD) today announ­ced its 3rd-gene­ra­ti­on Main­stream and Low-Power Mobi­le Acce­le­ra­ted Pro­ces­sing Units (APUs). Com­bi­ning cate­go­ry-lea­ding com­pu­te per­for­mance1,2 with uni­que fea­tures and rich user inter­ac­tions, the 2014 AMD Main­stream and Low-Power Mobi­le APUs (form­er­ly code­na­med “Bee­ma” and “Mul­lins,” respec­tively) are the ide­al choice for con­su­mer and com­mer­cial cli­ent devices ali­ke. The­se new mobi­le APUs fea­ture up to four new­ly-desi­gned x86 CPU cores with updated, indus­try-lea­ding AMD Rade­on™ gra­phics and a hard­ware-level data secu­ri­ty solu­ti­on based on the ARM® Cortex®-A5, all on a sin­gle, power-sip­ping sys­tem-on-chip (SoC). Pro­ducts based on the­se new APUs are alre­a­dy announ­ced by Leno­vo and Sam­sung, with many more expec­ted on-shelf in time for the 2014 back-to-school shop­ping season.

When desig­ning our 2014 Main­stream and Low-Power APUs, we were deter­mi­ned to once again set the stan­dard in gra­phics and total com­pu­te per­for­mance in fan­less form fac­tor cate­go­ries – and we’ve done just that,” said Bernd Lien­hard, AMD cor­po­ra­te vice pre­si­dent and gene­ral mana­ger, Cli­ent Pro­ducts. “The­se pro­ces­sors com­bi­ne the latest core tech­no­lo­gies – inclu­ding the first-ever ARM-based secu­ri­ty solu­ti­on on an x86 pro­ces­sor – with user expe­ri­en­ces that will delight con­su­mer and com­mer­cial buy­ers ali­ke in a packa­ge that’s impres­si­ve­ly ener­gy efficient.”

The new acce­le­ra­ted pro­ces­sors come equip­ped with the latest hard­ware fea­tures, impres­si­ve per­for­mance increa­ses, and enable dif­fe­ren­tia­ted soft­ware expe­ri­en­ces for more natu­ral user inter­ac­tion, a best-in-class video strea­ming expe­ri­ence, and a full Android expe­ri­ence on Win­dows-based PCs using BlueStacks soft­ware opti­mi­zed for AMD.

Unmat­ched Fea­ture Set

The 2014 AMD Main­stream and Low-Power Mobi­le APUs are desi­gned for con­su­mer and com­mer­cial mobi­le devices of all shapes and sizes, from fan­less tablets to 2‑in-1s like detacha­ble and con­ver­ti­ble note­books, to small-screen and ultrath­in lap­tops. They fea­ture up to four x86 “Puma+” CPU cores and AMD Rade­on™ R Series gra­phics based on Gra­phics Core Next (GCN) archi­tec­tu­re, which enables fast per­for­mance, out­stan­ding image qua­li­ty and low power con­sump­ti­on. Addi­tio­nal power manage­ment fea­tures inte­gra­ted into the APUs include:

Enhan­ced Security

And, mar­king AMD’s first imple­men­ta­ti­on of ARM-based tech­no­lo­gy into pro­ces­sors desi­gned for con­su­mer and com­mer­cial cli­ent devices, the 2014 AMD Main­stream and Low-Power APUs fea­ture an AMD-deve­lo­ped plat­form secu­ri­ty pro­ces­sor (PSP) based on the ARM Cor­tex-A5 fea­turing ARM Trust­Zo­ne® tech­no­lo­gy for enhan­ced data secu­ri­ty. The­se are the first and only x86 pro­ces­sors available to inte­gra­te an ARM core for secu­ri­ty. The inte­gra­ted PSP taps into the open stan­dards-based ARM Trust­Zo­ne eco­sys­tem and par­ti­ti­ons the new pro­ces­sors into two “vir­tu­al CPUs” – a “secu­re world” and a “nor­mal world” based on the type of data being pro­ces­sed – and ensu­res secu­re sto­rage and pro­ces­sing of sen­si­ti­ve data and trus­ted apps inclu­ding online pay­ments, digi­tal rights manage­ment and enter­pri­se- and web-based services.

Cate­go­ry-lea­ding Performance

The 2014 AMD Main­stream and Low-Power APUs deli­ver cate­go­ry-lea­ding com­pu­te power and a best-in-class gam­ing expe­ri­ence. Through the robust fea­ture set of the­se new APUs and engi­nee­ring pro­wess, they exhi­bit impres­si­ve per­for­mance impro­ve­ments when com­pared to the pre­vious gene­ra­ti­ons and to the competition.

2014 AMD Main­stream APUs:

  • Up to 100% bet­ter gra­phics per­for­mance over the pre­vious gene­ra­ti­on (“Kabi­ni”)4
  • Up to 20% power reduc­tion ver­sus the pre­vious gene­ra­ti­on (“Kabi­ni”)5
  • Increased memo­ry sup­port from the pre­vious gene­ra­ti­on to DDR3-1866
  • Up to 50% bet­ter gra­phics per­for­mance6 and up to 7x the com­pu­te per­for­mance1 ver­sus Intel® Pen­ti­um® (“Has­well U”)
  • Up to 3x the gra­phics per­for­mance7 and over 35% bet­ter sys­tem per­for­mance8 than Intel® Pen­ti­um® (“Bay Trail M”)

2014 AMD Low-Power APUs:

  • Over 2x the gra­phics per­for­mance-per-watt9 and near­ly 2x the pro­duc­ti­vi­ty per­for­mance-per-watt10 ver­sus the pre­vious gene­ra­ti­on (form­er­ly code­na­med “Temash”)
  • Bet­ter gra­phics per­for­mance than Intel® Core™ i311
  • Three times the com­pu­te per­for­mance of Intel’s Atom™ pro­ces­sor2

Dif­fe­ren­tia­ted User Experiences

Along with the array of hard­ware fea­tures and per­for­mance enhance­ments, the­se new pro­ces­sors also have seve­ral uni­que soft­ware capa­bi­li­ties to help con­su­mers and busi­ness users get more out of their PCs:

  • AMD Ges­tu­re Con­trol3 – enables touch-free con­trol of popu­lar apps using hand gestures
  • AMD Face Log­in3 – uses facial reco­gni­ti­on for log­ging into popu­lar websites
  • Pre­mi­um BlueStacks opti­mi­zed for AMD – brings a full, seam­less Android expe­ri­ence to Win­dows PCs
  • AMD Quick Stream Tech­no­lo­gy3 – deli­vers vir­tual­ly unin­ter­rupt­ed strea­ming video
  • AMD Per­fect Pic­tu­re5 – boosts image qua­li­ty auto­ma­ti­cal­ly for enhan­ced color, con­trast and resolution
  • AMD Ste­ady Video tech­no­lo­gy3 – helps smooth shaky, jit­tery vide­os with a sin­gle click

The­se new mobi­le APUs will be joi­n­ed by the top-of-the-line “Kaveri” APU, which is expec­ted to be in mar­ket mid-2014.

Sup­port­ing Resources 

About AMD

AMD (NYSE: AMD) designs and inte­gra­tes tech­no­lo­gy that powers mil­li­ons of intel­li­gent devices, inclu­ding per­so­nal com­pu­ters, tablets, game con­so­les and cloud ser­vers that defi­ne the new era of sur­round com­pu­ting. AMD solu­ti­ons enable peo­p­le ever­y­whe­re to rea­li­ze the full poten­ti­al of their favo­ri­te devices and appli­ca­ti­ons to push the boun­da­ries of what is pos­si­ble. For more infor­ma­ti­on, visit www.amd.com.

30

AMD, the AMD Arrow logo and Rade­on are trade­marks of Advan­ced Micro Devices, Inc. Other names are for infor­ma­tio­nal pur­po­ses only and may be trade­marks of their respec­ti­ve owners.

____________________________

FOOTNOTES:

  1. Test­ing con­duc­ted by AMD Per­for­mance Labs on opti­mi­zed AMD refe­rence sys­tems. PC manu­fac­tu­r­ers may vary con­fi­gu­ra­ti­on yiel­ding dif­fe­rent results. Base­mark CL is used to simu­la­te com­pu­te per­for­mance; AMD A6-6310 APU scored 21 while the “Has­well U” Pen­ti­um part scored 3. AMD “Lar­ne” refe­rence plat­form sys­tem using AMD A6-6310 APU with AMD Rade­on™ R4 Gra­phics, 2x2048 MBytes of DDR3-1600 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, and 13.300.0.0 — 13-Jan-2014 dri­ver. Intel® Pen­ti­um® 3556U @ 1.70GHz with Intel® HD Gra­phics, 2x2048 MBytes of DDR3-1600 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 10.18.10.3412 — 28-Jan-2014 dri­ver. BMN-11
  2. Test­ing con­duc­ted by AMD Per­for­mance Labs on opti­mi­zed AMD refe­rence sys­tems. PC manu­fac­tu­r­ers may vary con­fi­gu­ra­ti­on yiel­ding dif­fe­rent results. Base­mark CL is used to simu­la­te com­pu­te per­for­mance; A4 Micro-6400T APU scored 13 while the “Bay Trail T” plat­form scored 4. AMD “Dis­co­very” refe­rence plat­form sys­tem using AMD A4 Micro-6400T APU with Rade­on™ R6 Gra­phics, 2048 MBytes of DDR3-1333 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 13.302.1101.0 — 12-Feb-2014 dri­ver. Intel® “Bay Trail T” Atom™ CPU Z3770 @ 1.46GHz with Intel® HD Gra­phics, 2x1024 MBytes of DDR3-1066 RAM, 1920x1200x32, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 10.18.10.3348 — 30-Oct-2013 dri­ver. MUN-20
  3. Addi­tio­nal hard­ware (e.g. HD or 4K moni­tor, USB, 3.0 ports, wire­less­ly enab­led HDTV) and/or soft­ware (e.g., mul­ti­me­dia appli­ca­ti­ons and/or Wi-Fi access) are requi­red for the full ena­blem­ent of some fea­tures. HD/4K Video dis­play requi­res an HD/4K video source. Not all fea­tures may be sup­port­ed on all com­pon­ents or sys­tems — check with your com­po­nent or sys­tem manu­fac­tu­rer for spe­ci­fic model capa­bi­li­ties and sup­port­ed tech­no­lo­gies. For more infor­ma­ti­on on fea­tures www.amd.com/featuredetails
  4. Test­ing con­duc­ted by AMD Per­for­mance Labs on opti­mi­zed AMD refe­rence sys­tems. PC manu­fac­tu­r­ers may vary con­fi­gu­ra­ti­on yiel­ding dif­fe­rent results. 3DMark 11 is used to simu­la­te gra­phics per­for­mance; the AMD A6-6310 APU scored 778 while the AMD A6-5200 APU scored 699. AMD “Lar­ne” refe­rence plat­form sys­tem using AMD A6-6310 15W APU with AMD Rade­on™ R4 Gra­phics, 2x2048 MBytes of DDR3-1600 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, and 13.300.0.0 — 13-Jan-2014 dri­ver. AMD A6-5200 25W APU with Rade­on™ 8400 Gra­phics, 2x2048 MBytes of DDR3-1600 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 13.350.1005.0 — 22-Feb-2014 dri­ver. BMN‑9
  5. Test­ing con­duc­ted by AMD Per­for­mance Labs on opti­mi­zed AMD refe­rence sys­tems. PC manu­fac­tu­r­ers may vary con­fi­gu­ra­ti­on yiel­ding dif­fe­rent results. AMD A6-6310 APU will draw 0.62W power when run­ning an e‑reader com­pared to AMD A6-5200 0.81W APU draw on the same workload. Video file for power test­ing of video play­back: Video file: Big Buck Bun­ny; H.264/MPEG‑4 Part 10; 9783Kbps; 1920x1080@24 fps. AMD “Lar­ne” refe­rence plat­form sys­tem repre­sen­ting AMD A6-6310 15W APU with AMD Rade­on™ R4 Gra­phics, 1x4096 MBytes of DDR3L-1600 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1, and 13.302.1401 dri­ver. AMD A6-5200 25W APU with Rade­on™ 8400 Gra­phics, 2x2048 MBytes of DDR3L-1600 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8, 12.101.0.0 dri­ver. BMN-21
  6. Test­ing con­duc­ted by AMD Per­for­mance Labs on opti­mi­zed AMD refe­rence sys­tems. PC manu­fac­tu­r­ers may vary con­fi­gu­ra­ti­on yiel­ding dif­fe­rent results. 3DMark 11 is used to simu­la­te gra­phics per­for­mance; the AMD A6-6310 APU scored 778 while the “Has­well U” Pen­ti­um part scored 518. AMD “Lar­ne” refe­rence plat­form sys­tem using AMD A6-6310 APU with AMD Rade­on™ R4 Gra­phics, 2x2048 MBytes of DDR3-1600 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, and 13.300.0.0 — 13-Jan-2014 dri­ver. Intel® Pen­ti­um® 3556U @ 1.70GHz with Intel® HD Gra­phics, 2x2048 MBytes of DDR3-1600 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 10.18.10.3412 — 28-Jan-2014 dri­ver. BMN-16
  7. Test­ing con­duc­ted by AMD Per­for­mance Labs on opti­mi­zed AMD refe­rence sys­tems. PC manu­fac­tu­r­ers may vary con­fi­gu­ra­ti­on yiel­ding dif­fe­rent results. 3DMark 11 is used to simu­la­te gra­phics per­for­mance; the AMD A4-6210 APU scored 703 while the Pen­ti­um® N3510 plat­form scored 233. AMD “Lar­ne” refe­rence plat­form sys­tem using AMD A4-6210 APU with AMD Rade­on R4 Gra­phics, 2x2048 MBytes of DDR3-1600 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, and 13.300.0.0 — 13-Jan-2014 dri­ver. Intel® Pen­ti­um® CPU N3510 @ 1.99GHz with Intel® HD Gra­phics, 2x2048 MBytes of DDR3-1333 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 10.18.10.3366 — 25-Nov-2013 dri­ver. BMN-22
  8. Test­ing con­duc­ted by AMD Per­for­mance Labs on opti­mi­zed AMD refe­rence sys­tems. PC manu­fac­tu­r­ers may vary con­fi­gu­ra­ti­on yiel­ding dif­fe­rent results. PCMark 8 – Home v2 is used to simu­la­te pro­duc­ti­vi­ty per­for­mance; the AMD A4-6210 APU scored 1817 while the Pen­ti­um N3510 plat­form scored 1331. AMD “Lar­ne” refe­rence plat­form sys­tem using AMD A4-6210 APU with AMD Rade­on™ R3 Gra­phics, 2x1024 MBytes of DDR3-1600 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, and 13.300.0.0 — 13-Jan-2014 dri­ver. Intel Pen­ti­um CPU N3510 @ 1.99GHz with Intel HD Gra­phics, 2x2048 MBytes of DDR3-1333 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 10.18.10.3366 — 25-Nov-2013 dri­ver. BMN-23
  9. Test­ing con­duc­ted by AMD Per­for­mance Labs on opti­mi­zed AMD refe­rence sys­tems. PC manu­fac­tu­r­ers may vary con­fi­gu­ra­ti­on yiel­ding dif­fe­rent results. 3DMark 11 is used to simu­la­te gra­phics per­for­mance; 4.5W AMD A10 Micro-6700T APU scored 582 while the 8W A6-1450 APU scored 478. AMD “Dis­co­very” refe­rence plat­form sys­tem using AMD A10 Micro-6700T APU with Rade­on™ R6 Gra­phics, 2048 MBytes of DDR3-1333 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 13.302.1301.0 — 03-Mar-2014 dri­ver. AMD A6-1450 APU with Rade­on™ HD 8250 Gra­phics, 2x2048 MBytes of DDR3-1600 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 13.350.1005.0 — 22-Feb-2014 dri­ver. MUN-14
  10. Test­ing con­duc­ted by AMD Per­for­mance Labs on opti­mi­zed AMD refe­rence sys­tems. PC manu­fac­tu­r­ers may vary con­fi­gu­ra­ti­on yiel­ding dif­fe­rent results. PCMark 8 – Home v2 is used to simu­la­te pro­duc­ti­vi­ty per­for­mance; 4.5W AMD A10 Micro-6700T APU scored 1591 while the 8W A6-1450 APU scored 1487. AMD “Dis­co­very” refe­rence plat­form sys­tem using AMD A10 Micro-6700T APU with Rade­on™ R6 Gra­phics, 2048 MBytes of DDR3-1333 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 13.302.1301.0 — 03-Mar-2014 dri­ver. AMD A6-1450 APU with Rade­on™ HD 8250. MUN-15
  11. Test­ing con­duc­ted by AMD Per­for­mance Labs on opti­mi­zed AMD refe­rence sys­tems. PC manu­fac­tu­r­ers may vary con­fi­gu­ra­ti­on yiel­ding dif­fe­rent results. 3DMark 11 is used to simu­la­te gra­phics per­for­mance; the AMD A10 Micro-6700T APU scored 582 while the “Has­well Y” Core i3 scored 571. AMD “Dis­co­very” refe­rence plat­form sys­tem using AMD A10 Micro-6700T APU with Rade­on™ R6 Gra­phics, 2048 MBytes of DDR3-1333 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 13.302.1301.0 — 03-Mar-2014 dri­ver. Intel® Core™ i3-4010Y CPU @ 1.30GHz with Intel® HD Gra­phics Fami­ly Gra­phics, 4096 MBytes of DDR3-1600 RAM, Micro­soft Win­dows 8.1 Sin­gle Lan­guage, 10.18.10.3412 — 28-Jan-2014 dri­ver. MUN-12

 

Cau­tio­na­ry Statement:

This docu­ment con­ta­ins for­ward-loo­king state­ments con­cer­ning AMD, inclu­ding, inclu­ding the timing and avai­la­bi­li­ty of fea­tures and func­tion­a­li­ty of its future pro­ducts, which are made pur­su­ant to the safe har­bor pro­vi­si­ons of the Pri­va­te Secu­ri­ties Liti­ga­ti­on Reform Act of 1995. For­ward-loo­king state­ments are com­mon­ly iden­ti­fied by words such as “would,” “may,” “expects,” “belie­ves,” “plans,” “intends,” “pro­jects,” and other terms with simi­lar mea­ning. Inves­tors are cau­tio­ned that the for­ward-loo­king state­ments in this pre­sen­ta­ti­on are based on cur­rent beliefs, assump­ti­ons and expec­ta­ti­ons, speak only as of the date of this pre­sen­ta­ti­on and invol­ve risks and uncer­tain­ties that could cau­se actu­al results to dif­fer mate­ri­al­ly from cur­rent expec­ta­ti­ons. Risks include the pos­si­bi­li­ty that that Intel Corporation’s pri­cing, mar­ke­ting and reba­ting pro­grams, pro­duct bund­ling, stan­dard set­ting, new pro­duct intro­duc­tions or other acti­vi­ties may nega­tively impact the Company’s plans; that the Com­pa­ny will requi­re addi­tio­nal fun­ding and may be unable to rai­se suf­fi­ci­ent capi­tal on favorable terms, or at all; that cus­to­mers stop buy­ing the Company’s pro­ducts or mate­ri­al­ly redu­ce their ope­ra­ti­ons or demand for its pro­ducts; that the Com­pa­ny may be unable to deve­lop, launch and ramp new pro­ducts and tech­no­lo­gies in the volu­mes that are requi­red by the mar­ket at matu­re yields on a time­ly basis; that the Company’s third-par­ty foundry sup­pli­ers will be unable to tran­si­ti­on the Company’s pro­ducts to advan­ced manu­fac­tu­ring pro­cess tech­no­lo­gies in a time­ly and effec­ti­ve way or to manu­fac­tu­re the Company’s pro­ducts on a time­ly basis in suf­fi­ci­ent quan­ti­ties and using com­pe­ti­ti­ve pro­cess tech­no­lo­gies; that the Com­pa­ny will be unable to obtain suf­fi­ci­ent manu­fac­tu­ring capa­ci­ty or com­pon­ents to meet demand for its pro­ducts or will not ful­ly uti­li­ze the Company’s pro­jec­ted manu­fac­tu­ring capa­ci­ty needs at GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GF) micro­pro­ces­sor manu­fac­tu­ring faci­li­ties; that the Company’s requi­re­ments for wafers will be less than the fixed num­ber of wafers that we agreed to purcha­se from GF or GF encoun­ters pro­blems that signi­fi­cant­ly redu­ce the num­ber of func­tion­al die the Com­pa­ny recei­ves from each wafer; that the Com­pa­ny is unable to suc­cessful­ly imple­ment its long-term busi­ness stra­tegy; that the Com­pa­ny inac­cu­ra­te­ly esti­ma­tes the quan­ti­ty or type of pro­ducts that its cus­to­mers will want in the future or will ulti­m­ate­ly end up purcha­sing, resul­ting in excess or obso­le­te inven­to­ry; that the Com­pa­ny is unable to mana­ge the risks rela­ted to the use of its third-par­ty dis­tri­bu­tors and add-in-board (AIB) part­ners or offer the appro­pria­te incen­ti­ves to focus them on the sale of the Company’s pro­ducts; that the Com­pa­ny may be unable to main­tain the level of invest­ment in rese­arch and deve­lo­p­ment that is requi­red to remain com­pe­ti­ti­ve; that the­re may be unex­pec­ted varia­ti­ons in mar­ket growth and demand for the Company’s pro­ducts and tech­no­lo­gies in light of the pro­duct mix that it may have available at any par­ti­cu­lar time; that glo­bal busi­ness and eco­no­mic con­di­ti­ons, inclu­ding con­su­mer PC mar­ket con­di­ti­ons, will not impro­ve or will wor­sen; that demand for com­pu­ters will be lower than curr­ent­ly expec­ted and the effect of poli­ti­cal or eco­no­mic insta­bi­li­ty, dome­sti­cal­ly or inter­na­tio­nal­ly, on the Company’s sales or sup­p­ly chain. Inves­tors are urged to review in detail the risks and uncer­tain­ties in the Company’s Secu­ri­ties and Exch­an­ge Com­mis­si­on filings, inclu­ding but not limi­t­ed to the Annu­al Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended Decem­ber 28, 2013.