2nd Gen AMD EPYC™ Continues Market Momentum with New Customers, New Performance Milestones and Now 100 World Records(1)

  • Dell Tech­no­lo­gies announ­ces five new­ly desi­gned Dell EMC PowerEdge ser­vers opti­mi­zed for the 2nd Gen AMD EPYC processor 

  • Nokia and IBM Cloud high­light per­for­mance advan­ta­ges of 2nd Gen AMD EPYC pro­ces­sors for their use, while ATOS, HPE, OVH­cloud, TSMC and Super­mi­cro announ­ce expan­ded adop­ti­on for cloud, enter­pri­se and high per­for­mance com­pu­ting workloads 

  • New AMD EPYC 7H12 pro­ces­sor brings unbrid­led per­for­mance to HPC cus­to­mers with lea­der­ship super­com­pu­ting per­for­mance on LINPACK benchmark 

ROME, Sept. 18, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — At the Euro­pean launch in Rome, Ita­ly AMD (NASDAQ: AMD) today high­ligh­ted the gro­wing adop­ti­on of 2nd Gen AMD EPYC™ pro­ces­sors across cloud, enter­pri­se and HPC customers.

  • Dell Tech­no­lo­giesannoun­ced five new Dell EMC PowerEdge plat­forms powered by the 2nd Gen AMD EPYC pro­ces­sor. The­se plat­forms were desi­gned from the groun­dup and opti­mi­zed to sup­port the fea­tures of the new AMD EPYC pro­ces­sor inclu­ding PCIe® 4.0.
  • IBM Cloud detail­ed how 2nd Gen EPYC pro­ces­sors can sup­port IBM Cloud cus­to­mer needs in spe­ci­fic are­as inclu­ding hel­ping impro­ve cloud secu­ri­ty, bet­ter memo­ry band­width for big data and ana­ly­tics workloads and core sca­ling and breakth­rough per­for­mance for con­tai­ner workloads. IBM plans to have more to share in 2020 about its per­for­mance offe­rings for clients.
  • Nokia high­ligh­ted how 2nd Gen EPYC pro­ces­sors signi­fi­cant­ly acce­le­ra­te its Cloud Packet Core sys­tem which helps ser­vice pro­vi­ders deli­ver con­ver­ged broad­band, IoT, and machi­ne-type com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on ser­vices for 5G. In test­ing, Nokia found its Cloud Packet Core sys­tem with 2nd Gen AMD EPYC pro­vi­ded a 2X increase in packet through­put com­pared to pre­vious sys­tems2.
  • ATOS, a glo­bal lea­der in digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on, announ­ced Gen­ci is using the 2nd Gen AMD EPYC pro­ces­sors to expand the use of super­com­pu­ting for the bene­fit of French sci­en­ti­fic com­mu­ni­ties. Gen­ci and ATOS are using the 2nd Gen AMD EPYC pro­ces­sor due to its breakth­rough per­for­mance, effi­ci­en­cy and TCO.
  • OVH­cloud, a glo­bal cloud pro­vi­der spe­cia­li­zing in deli­ve­ring indus­try-lea­ding per­for­mance and cost-effec­ti­ve solu­ti­ons, announ­ced a new high-end hos­ting ins­tance based on the AMD EPYC7402P pro­ces­sor. This ins­tance will be available at the end of 2019.
  • TSMC announ­ced its adop­ti­on of 2nd Gen AMD EPYC hel­ping power its next gene­ra­ti­on rese­arch and lea­ding pro­cess technology.

Today, we are proud to have new plat­forms from Dell and new cus­to­mers adop­ting 2nd Gen AMD EPYC for cloud, enter­pri­se com­pu­ting and HPC,” said For­rest Nor­rod, seni­or vice pre­si­dent and gene­ral mana­ger, Dat­a­cen­ter and Embedded Solu­ti­ons Busi­ness Group. “We con­ti­nue to take the AMD EPYC pro­ces­sor to new heights and are thril­led to have the eco­sys­tem sup­port­ing us across hard­ware, soft­ware and cloud pro­vi­ders as we face the chal­lenges of the modern data cen­ter head-on.”

EPYC Per­for­mance for HPC
AMD also announ­ced a new addi­ti­on to the 2nd Gene­ra­ti­on AMD EPYC fami­ly, the AMD EPYC 7H12 pro­ces­sor. The 64 core/128 thread, 2.6Ghz base fre­quen­cy, 3.3Ghz max boost fre­quen­cy, 280W TDP pro­ces­sor is spe­ci­fi­cal­ly built for HPC cus­to­mers and workloads, using liquid coo­ling to deli­ver lea­der­ship super­com­pu­ting per­for­mance3. In an ATOS test­ing on their Bull­Se­qua­na XH2000, the new AMD EPYC 7H12 pro­ces­sor achie­ved a LINPACK score of ~ 4.2 Tera­FLOPS, ~11% bet­ter than the AMD EPYC 7742 pro­ces­sor4.

Sup­port­ing Resources

  • Learn more about 2nd Gen AMD EPYC Pro­ces­sors here
  • Dis­co­ver whe­re to buy 2nd Gen AMD EPYC Pro­ces­sors here
  • Read our blog about the Rome cus­to­mer event here
  • Fol­low AMD on Twit­ter

About AMD
For 50 years AMD has dri­ven inno­va­ti­on in high-per­for­mance com­pu­ting, gra­phics and visua­liza­ti­on tech­no­lo­gies ― the buil­ding blocks for gam­ing, immersi­ve plat­forms and the dat­a­cen­ter. Hundreds of mil­li­ons of con­su­mers, lea­ding For­tu­ne 500 busi­nesses and cut­ting-edge sci­en­ti­fic rese­arch faci­li­ties around the world rely on AMD tech­no­lo­gy dai­ly to impro­ve how they live, work and play. AMD employees around the world are focu­sed on buil­ding gre­at pro­ducts that push the boun­da­ries of what is pos­si­ble. For more infor­ma­ti­on about how AMD is enab­ling today and inspi­ring tomor­row, visit the AMD (NASDAQ: AMDweb­siteblogFace­book and Twit­ter pages.

Cau­tio­na­ry Statement
This press release con­ta­ins for­ward-loo­king state­ments con­cer­ning Advan­ced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) inclu­ding, but not limi­t­ed to, the fea­tures, func­tion­a­li­ty, per­for­mance, avai­la­bi­li­ty, timing, pri­cing, expec­ta­ti­ons and expec­ted bene­fits of the 2nd Gen AMD EPYCTM pro­ces­sors; the mar­ket momen­tum and gro­wing adop­ti­on of the 2nd Gen AMD EPYC pro­ces­sors; and the expec­ted timing and bene­fits of new part­ner offe­rings, which are made pur­su­ant to the Safe Har­bor pro­vi­si­ons of the Pri­va­te Secu­ri­ties Liti­ga­ti­on Reform Act of 1995. For­ward-loo­king state­ments are com­mon­ly iden­ti­fied by words such as “would,” “intends,” “belie­ves,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “plans,” “pro for­ma,” “esti­ma­tes,” “anti­ci­pa­tes,” or the nega­ti­ve of the­se words and phra­ses, other varia­ti­ons of the­se words and phra­ses or com­pa­ra­ble ter­mi­no­lo­gy. Inves­tors are cau­tio­ned that the for­ward-loo­king state­ments in this docu­ment are based on cur­rent beliefs, assump­ti­ons and expec­ta­ti­ons, speak only as of the date of this docu­ment and invol­ve risks and uncer­tain­ties that could cau­se actu­al results to dif­fer mate­ri­al­ly from cur­rent expec­ta­ti­ons. Such state­ments are sub­ject to cer­tain known and unknown risks and uncer­tain­ties, many of which are dif­fi­cult to pre­dict and gene­ral­ly bey­ond AMD’s con­trol, that could cau­se actu­al results and other future events to dif­fer mate­ri­al­ly from tho­se expres­sed in, or impli­ed or pro­jec­ted by, the for­ward-loo­king infor­ma­ti­on and state­ments. Mate­ri­al fac­tors that could cau­se actu­al results to dif­fer mate­ri­al­ly from cur­rent expec­ta­ti­ons include, wit­hout limi­ta­ti­on, the fol­lo­wing: Intel Corporation’s domi­nan­ce of the micro­pro­ces­sor mar­ket and its aggres­si­ve busi­ness prac­ti­ces may limit AMD’s abili­ty to com­pe­te effec­tively; AMD has a wafer sup­p­ly agree­ment with GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GF) with obli­ga­ti­ons to purcha­se all of its micro­pro­ces­sor and APU pro­duct requi­re­ments, and a cer­tain por­ti­on of its GPU pro­duct requi­re­ments, manu­fac­tu­red at pro­cess nodes lar­ger than 7 nano­me­ter from GF with limi­t­ed excep­ti­ons. If GF is not able to satis­fy AMD’s manu­fac­tu­ring requi­re­ments, AMD’s busi­ness could be adver­se­ly impac­ted; AMD reli­es on third par­ties to manu­fac­tu­re its pro­ducts, and if they are unable to do so on a time­ly basis in suf­fi­ci­ent quan­ti­ties and using com­pe­ti­ti­ve tech­no­lo­gies, AMD’s busi­ness could be mate­ri­al­ly adver­se­ly affec­ted; fail­ure to achie­ve expec­ted manu­fac­tu­ring yields for AMD’s pro­ducts could nega­tively impact its finan­cial results; the suc­cess of AMD’s busi­ness is depen­dent upon its abili­ty to intro­du­ce pro­ducts on a time­ly basis with fea­tures and per­for­mance levels that pro­vi­de value to its cus­to­mers while sup­port­ing and coin­ci­ding with signi­fi­cant indus­try tran­si­ti­ons; if AMD can­not gene­ra­te suf­fi­ci­ent reve­nue and ope­ra­ting cash flow or obtain exter­nal finan­cing, it may face a cash short­fall and be unable to make all of its plan­ned invest­ments in rese­arch and deve­lo­p­ment or other stra­te­gic invest­ments; the loss of a signi­fi­cant cus­to­mer may have a mate­ri­al adver­se effect on AMD; AMD’s receipt of reve­nue from its semi-cus­tom SoC pro­ducts is depen­dent upon its tech­no­lo­gy being desi­gned into third-par­ty pro­ducts and the suc­cess of tho­se pro­ducts; glo­bal eco­no­mic and mar­ket uncer­tain­ty may adver­se­ly impact AMD’s busi­ness and ope­ra­ting results; AMD’s pro­ducts may be sub­ject to secu­ri­ty vul­nerabi­li­ties that could have a mate­ri­al adver­se effect on AMD; IT outa­ges, data loss, data brea­ches and cyber-attacks could com­pro­mi­se AMD’s intellec­tu­al pro­per­ty or other sen­si­ti­ve infor­ma­ti­on, be cos­t­ly to reme­dia­te and cau­se signi­fi­cant dama­ge to its busi­ness, repu­ta­ti­on and ope­ra­ti­ons; AMD’s ope­ra­ting results are sub­ject to quar­ter­ly and sea­so­nal sales pat­terns; AMD may not be able to gene­ra­te suf­fi­ci­ent cash to ser­vice its debt obli­ga­ti­ons or meet its working capi­tal requi­re­ments; AMD has a lar­ge amount of indeb­ted­ness which could adver­se­ly affect its finan­cial posi­ti­on and pre­vent it from imple­men­ting its stra­tegy or ful­fil­ling its con­trac­tu­al obli­ga­ti­ons; the agree­ments gover­ning AMD’s notes and the Secu­red Revol­ving Line of Cre­dit impo­se rest­ric­tions on AMD that may adver­se­ly affect AMD’s abili­ty to ope­ra­te its busi­ness; the mar­kets in which AMD’s pro­ducts are sold are high­ly com­pe­ti­ti­ve; AMD’s world­wi­de ope­ra­ti­ons are sub­ject to poli­ti­cal, legal and eco­no­mic risks and natu­ral dis­as­ters, which could have a mate­ri­al adver­se effect on it; the con­ver­si­on of the 2.125% Con­ver­ti­ble Seni­or Notes due 2026 may dilute the owner­ship inte­rest of AMD’s exis­ting stock­hol­ders, or may other­wi­se depress the pri­ce of its com­mon stock; uncer­tain­ties invol­ving the orde­ring and ship­ment of AMD’s pro­ducts could mate­ri­al­ly adver­se­ly affect it; the demand for AMD’s pro­ducts depends in part on the mar­ket con­di­ti­ons in the indus­tries into which they are sold. Fluc­tua­tions in demand for AMD’s pro­ducts or a mar­ket decli­ne in any of the­se indus­tries could have a mate­ri­al adver­se effect on its results of ope­ra­ti­ons; AMD’s abili­ty to design and intro­du­ce new pro­ducts in a time­ly man­ner is depen­dent upon third-par­ty intellec­tu­al pro­per­ty; AMD depends on third-par­ty com­pa­nies for the design, manu­fac­tu­re and sup­p­ly of mother­boards, soft­ware and other com­pu­ter plat­form com­pon­ents to sup­port its busi­ness; if AMD loses Micro­soft Corporation’s sup­port for its pro­ducts or other soft­ware ven­dors do not design and deve­lop soft­ware to run on AMD’s pro­ducts, its abili­ty to sell its pro­ducts could be mate­ri­al­ly adver­se­ly affec­ted; and AMD’s reli­ance on third-par­ty dis­tri­bu­tors and add-in-board part­ners sub­jects it to cer­tain risks.  Inves­tors are urged to review in detail the risks and uncer­tain­ties in AMD’s Secu­ri­ties and Exch­an­ge Com­mis­si­on filings, inclu­ding but not limi­t­ed to AMD’s Quar­ter­ly Report on Form 10‑Q for the quar­ter ended June 29, 2019.

AMD, the AMD Arrow logo, EPYC and com­bi­na­ti­ons the­reof, are trade­marks of Advan­ced Micro Devices, Inc. Other names are for infor­ma­tio­nal pur­po­ses only and may be trade­marks of their respec­ti­ve owners.

1 For a com­ple­te list of world records see http://amd.com/worldrecords. ROM-169
2 Per­for­mance not veri­fied inde­pendent­ly by AMD
3 EPYC 7H12 pro­ces­sor boost fre­quen­ci­es may be achie­ved only with a coo­ling solu­ti­on that meets group ‘Z’ requi­re­ments.  Achie­va­ble boost fre­quen­ci­es may vary depen­ding on the effec­ti­ve­ness of the actu­al coo­ling solu­ti­on. ROM-282
4 Based on ATOS test­ing of HPL v2.1 bench­mark, as of Sep­tem­ber 13, 2019, using a 2P AMD EPYC7H12 powered pro­duc­tion ser­ver ver­sus AMD inter­nal test­ing of HPL v2.1 bench­mark, as of July 17, 2019, using a 2P AMD EPYC™ 7742 powered AMD refe­rence ser­ver. AMD has not inde­pendent­ly veri­fied the 7H12 scores. Results may vary. ROM-287